Reform and Regression: Discourses of Water Reallocation in Mpumalanga, South Africa

Rebecca Peters, Philip Woodhouse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


ABSTRACT: This paper traces the implementation of reforms in water resource management in the Inkomati catchment, South Africa, since the National Water Act of 1998. It focuses on the ways that the predominant water users – white commercial farmers – have negotiated competing demands for water, particularly from black farmers and from growing urban water supply systems. The paper argues that existing commercial agricultural interests have largely succeeded in maintaining their access to water. We investigate this outcome using a cultural political economy perspective which focuses on an analysis of discourses of water allocation and explores how different discourses are reinforced by social practice and through their adoption by, and diffusion through, institutions of water governance. The research has identified three principle narratives that underpin discourse: scarcity, participation, and rights. It focuses on the ways in which calculative techniques for quantifying water use and economic value have been used to reinforce discourses rooted in narratives of water scarcity, and how these narratives ultimately structure water reallocation by agencies of water governance. The paper also identifies the wider political and economic dynamics at play, and the processes that may shift the current discourse of water reallocation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)853-868
Number of pages16
JournalWater Alternatives
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2019

Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms

  • Global Development Institute


Dive into the research topics of 'Reform and Regression: Discourses of Water Reallocation in Mpumalanga, South Africa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this