TY - JOUR
T1 - Regional geography of glacier mass balance variability over seven decades 1946-2015
AU - Braithwaite, Roger J.
AU - Hughes, Philip
N1 - Funding Information:
Interaction with the responsible editor (MZ) and two referees has greatly improved this manuscript. The University of Manchester has supported RB with an Honorary Research Fellowship since 2010. Many individual scientists and organisations collected the data used in this study and made them available to the international community through the archives of the World Glacier Monitoring Service (WGMS) in Z?rich, Switzerland. Such openness and generosity with hard-won data are in the highest traditions of science. The staff of the WGMS have been energetic champions of mass balance study over several decades.
Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright © 2020 Braithwaite and Hughes.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/8/11
Y1 - 2020/8/11
N2 - Despite much progress with remote sensing, on–site measurements of glacier mass balance (with stakes and snow pits) still have advantages for resolution of interannual and seasonal changes of mass balance. Understanding these changes may help to identify the types of glaciers most sensitive to climate change. The standard deviation of mass balance data series for a few years describes the interannual variability, and balance amplitude, defined as half the difference between winter and summer balances, describes the seasonal variability. Interannual variability increases with seasonal variability, and seasonal variability increases with annual precipitation and summer temperature available from a half–degree gridded climatology. Measured glaciers have higher mean and median precipitation than average for all glaciers in the Randolph Glacier Inventory (version 6). High balance amplitudes are associated with warm/wet (maritime) environments and low amplitudes with cold/dry (continental) environments, as shown in previous studies of climate at the equilibrium line altitude. Balance amplitude can be modelled for half–degree grid squares in the glacier inventory using multiple regression of measured balance amplitude on the climate data. The resulting modelled balance amplitude is relatively low for Arctic Islands and Central Asia, but high for Western North America, Iceland, Scandinavia, Alps and Caucasus.
AB - Despite much progress with remote sensing, on–site measurements of glacier mass balance (with stakes and snow pits) still have advantages for resolution of interannual and seasonal changes of mass balance. Understanding these changes may help to identify the types of glaciers most sensitive to climate change. The standard deviation of mass balance data series for a few years describes the interannual variability, and balance amplitude, defined as half the difference between winter and summer balances, describes the seasonal variability. Interannual variability increases with seasonal variability, and seasonal variability increases with annual precipitation and summer temperature available from a half–degree gridded climatology. Measured glaciers have higher mean and median precipitation than average for all glaciers in the Randolph Glacier Inventory (version 6). High balance amplitudes are associated with warm/wet (maritime) environments and low amplitudes with cold/dry (continental) environments, as shown in previous studies of climate at the equilibrium line altitude. Balance amplitude can be modelled for half–degree grid squares in the glacier inventory using multiple regression of measured balance amplitude on the climate data. The resulting modelled balance amplitude is relatively low for Arctic Islands and Central Asia, but high for Western North America, Iceland, Scandinavia, Alps and Caucasus.
KW - Climatic Research Unit/University of East Anglia gridded climatology
KW - Randolph Glacier Inventory
KW - balance amplitude
KW - climate at equilibrium line altitude
KW - glacier mass balance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089845285&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/feart.2020.00302
DO - 10.3389/feart.2020.00302
M3 - Article
SN - 2296-6463
VL - 8
JO - Frontiers in Earth Science
JF - Frontiers in Earth Science
M1 - 302
ER -