Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Regulating transnational corporate bribery: Anti-bribery and corruption in the UK and Germany

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

388 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Recent large-scale cases involving multi-national corporations such as the BAE Systems and Siemens bribery scandals illustrate the difficulties faced by the UK and German sovereign states in controlling complex trans-national and multi-jurisdictional crimes. This article analyses the mixture of enforcement, self-regulatory and hybrid mechanisms that are emerging as part of UK and German responses to controlling transnational corporate bribery. This regulatory landscape incorporates a diverse array of direct and indirect state and non-state 'regulatory' actors of varying levels of formality. Mechanisms of a self-regulatory nature vary in terms of their mandatory/voluntary requirements and manufactured/organic formation. However, there is an assumption that the emergence of a variety of enforcement, self-regulatory and innovative hybrid mechanisms is sufficient but in reality this is not the case. Instead, the key argument of the article is that while these mechanisms are aiding the response, they are likely to fail leading to the default position of accommodation by state agencies, even where the will to enforce the law is high. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-145
Number of pages18
JournalCrime, Law and Social Change
Volume60
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2013

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Regulating transnational corporate bribery: Anti-bribery and corruption in the UK and Germany'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this