Religious change in twentieth-century Ireland: A spatial history

Niall Cunningham, Ian Gregory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The conflicts that have deeply affected the island of Ireland in the twentieth century have been political, rather than religious, in basis. However, the powerful coalescence of Catholicism and nationalism on one hand, and Protestantism and unionism on the other, has meant that religious affiliation in Ireland has come to embody a wider range of cultural, political and social values. Furthermore, the successive waves of organised colonisation in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries have left the island with the legacy of a distinctive religious geography, which became the explicit template for the political division of the island in 1921 as well as having profound implications for its development since the European Reformation of the early modern period. Yet, despite its centrality to Irish history and geography, it has been difficult to assess detailed change in that religious geography due to the inconsistency of territorial units over time. This article presents findings from a major research project funded by the UK's Arts and Humanities Research Council which used Geographical Information Systems technology to standardise administrative boundaries across the island in the twentieth century. In doing so, it is able to shed new light on the radically divergent religio-spatial trajectories of different parts of the island in relation to political, social and economic developments. © 2013 © 2013 Geographical Society of Ireland.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)209-233
Number of pages24
JournalIrish Geography
Volume45
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2012

Keywords

  • areal interpolation
  • census data
  • GIS
  • Ireland
  • population change
  • religious geography
  • segregation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Religious change in twentieth-century Ireland: A spatial history'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this