Repeatability of the TEN(HL) test for detecting cochlear dead regions

Susan Cairns, Rachel Frith, Kevin J. Munro, Brian C J Moore

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The aim of this study was to investigate the short-term test-retest repeatability of the TEN(HL) test. Participants comprised 15 teenagers (mean age 14 years) with long-standing severe-to-profound hearing impairment, and 20 adults (mean age 74 years) with moderate-to-severe hearing impairment. Testing was repeated using the same equipment and procedures, after an interval of less than five days. The number of ears that met the criteria for diagnosing a cochlear dead region on initial test was three (13%) and nine (22.5%) for the teenagers and adults, respectively. Overall, the number of ears that changed category on retest was two (8%) and three (7.5%) for the teenagers and adults, respectively. Except at 1.5 and 4 kHz, the number of ears that changed category at individual frequencies was less than 5% for both groups of participants. TEN(HL) test repeatability was good when the results were categorized by ear or by frequency. The majority of ears that changed category on retest just met the dead-region criteria at an isolated frequency. An immediate retest is advisable in such cases. © 2007 British Society of Audiology, International Society of Audiology, and Nordic Audiological Society.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)575-584
    Number of pages9
    JournalInternational Journal of Audiology
    Volume46
    Issue number10
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2007

    Keywords

    • Dead regions
    • Hearing aid fitting
    • Hearing impairment
    • Inner hair cells
    • Repeatability
    • Teenagers
    • TEN(HL) test

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Repeatability of the TEN(HL) test for detecting cochlear dead regions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this