Repetitive stimulation and its affect on temporal and non-temporal judgements

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    There is an increasing weight of evidence that there may exist a fundamental link between our perception of time (and internal clock speed), and the rate at which we can process information. Numerous studies have shown that repetitive stimulation either in the form of clicks, or visual flickers, can alter judgement of duration, typically making estimations of duration longer relative to situations where there are no clicks or flickers presented (Droit-Volet and Wearden, 2002, Jones et al., 2011, Penton-Voak et al., 1996, Treisman et al., 1990 and Wearden et al., 1999). Some studies have interpreted this as evidence of a manipulation of internal clock speed. More recently it has been shown that this same type of repetitive stimulation can also affect reaction time and memory encoding (Jones et al., 2011), the perception of velocity (Makin et al., 2012 and Makin et al., 2013), and the judgement of line length and number (although only when presented sequentially; Droit-Volet, 2010). This talk will make the argument that the key to understanding these effects, and whether these different types of judgement are indeed related, lies in understanding the mechanism of action of the repetitive stimulation.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)137-138
    Number of pages1
    JournalProcedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
    Volume126
    Publication statusPublished - 21 Mar 2014

    Keywords

    • Temporal judgements
    • Repetitive stimulation
    • Reaction time
    • Click trains
    • Time perception
    • Flickers

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Repetitive stimulation and its affect on temporal and non-temporal judgements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this