Reply to the 'Comment on "non-symmetric substituted ureas locked in an (E,Z) conformation: an unusual anion binding via supramolecular assembly" by B. Ośmiałowski and E. Kolehmainen, New J. Chem., 2014, 38, DOI: 10.1039/c3nj01282d

Claudia Caltagirone; Alessandra Garau; Francesco Isaia; Vito Lippolis; Riccardo Montis; Martina Olivari; Mariano Andrea Scorciapino

doi:10.1039/c4nj00170b

Reply to the 'Comment on "non-symmetric substituted ureas locked in an (E,Z) conformation: an unusual anion binding via supramolecular assembly" by B. Ośmiałowski and E. Kolehmainen, New J. Chem., 2014, 38, DOI: 10.1039/c3nj01282d

Claudia Caltagirone^*, Alessandra Garau, Francesco Isaia, Vito Lippolis, Riccardo Montis, Martina Olivari, Mariano Andrea Scorciapino

^*Corresponding author for this work

Universita di Cagliari

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

We reply to the comments raised by Ośmiałowski and Kolehmainen in their discussion on conformations of ureidic receptors as set out in our article (M. Olivari et al., New J. Chem., 2013, 37, 663-669). Here we appreciate the common views we share and welcome the clarity this gives, and we discuss and question some of their criticisms of the original paper and clarify our opinion in this area.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	2704-2706
Number of pages	3
Journal	New Journal of Chemistry
Volume	38
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1039/c4nj00170b
Publication status	Published - 26 Feb 2014

Keywords

acetic acid
anion
benzoic acid
oxygen
proton
urea
anisotropy
conformation
hydrogen bond
hypothesis
priority journal
proton nuclear magnetic resonance
review
solid state
supramolecular chemistry
titrimetry

Access to Document

10.1039/c4nj00170b

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to the 'Comment on "non-symmetric substituted ureas locked in an (E,Z) conformation: an unusual anion binding via supramolecular assembly" by B. Ośmiałowski and E. Kolehmainen, New J. Chem., 2014, 38, DOI: 10.1039/c3nj01282d'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Caltagirone, C., Garau, A., Isaia, F., Lippolis, V., Montis, R., Olivari, M., & Scorciapino, M. A. (2014). Reply to the 'Comment on "non-symmetric substituted ureas locked in an (E,Z) conformation: an unusual anion binding via supramolecular assembly" by B. Ośmiałowski and E. Kolehmainen, New J. Chem., 2014, 38, DOI: 10.1039/c3nj01282d. New Journal of Chemistry, 38(6), 2704-2706. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4nj00170b

Caltagirone, Claudia ; Garau, Alessandra ; Isaia, Francesco et al. / Reply to the 'Comment on "non-symmetric substituted ureas locked in an (E,Z) conformation : an unusual anion binding via supramolecular assembly" by B. Ośmiałowski and E. Kolehmainen, New J. Chem., 2014, 38, DOI: 10.1039/c3nj01282d. In: New Journal of Chemistry. 2014 ; Vol. 38, No. 6. pp. 2704-2706.

@article{417e2e5803ce4506ab8b045ed331cb42,

title = "Reply to the 'Comment on {"}non-symmetric substituted ureas locked in an (E,Z) conformation: an unusual anion binding via supramolecular assembly{"} by B. O{\'s}mia{\l}owski and E. Kolehmainen, New J. Chem., 2014, 38, DOI: 10.1039/c3nj01282d",

abstract = "We reply to the comments raised by O{\'s}mia{\l}owski and Kolehmainen in their discussion on conformations of ureidic receptors as set out in our article (M. Olivari et al., New J. Chem., 2013, 37, 663-669). Here we appreciate the common views we share and welcome the clarity this gives, and we discuss and question some of their criticisms of the original paper and clarify our opinion in this area.",

keywords = "acetic acid, anion, benzoic acid, oxygen, proton, urea, anisotropy, conformation, hydrogen bond, hypothesis, priority journal, proton nuclear magnetic resonance, review, solid state, supramolecular chemistry, titrimetry",

author = "Claudia Caltagirone and Alessandra Garau and Francesco Isaia and Vito Lippolis and Riccardo Montis and Martina Olivari and Scorciapino, {Mariano Andrea}",

year = "2014",

month = feb,

day = "26",

doi = "10.1039/c4nj00170b",

language = "English",

volume = "38",

pages = "2704--2706",

journal = "New Journal of Chemistry",

issn = "1144-0546",

publisher = "Royal Society of Chemistry",

number = "6",

}

Caltagirone, C, Garau, A, Isaia, F, Lippolis, V, Montis, R, Olivari, M & Scorciapino, MA 2014, 'Reply to the 'Comment on "non-symmetric substituted ureas locked in an (E,Z) conformation: an unusual anion binding via supramolecular assembly" by B. Ośmiałowski and E. Kolehmainen, New J. Chem., 2014, 38, DOI: 10.1039/c3nj01282d', New Journal of Chemistry, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 2704-2706. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4nj00170b

Reply to the 'Comment on "non-symmetric substituted ureas locked in an (E,Z) conformation: an unusual anion binding via supramolecular assembly" by B. Ośmiałowski and E. Kolehmainen, New J. Chem., 2014, 38, DOI: 10.1039/c3nj01282d. / Caltagirone, Claudia; Garau, Alessandra; Isaia, Francesco et al.
In: New Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 38, No. 6, 26.02.2014, p. 2704-2706.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to the 'Comment on "non-symmetric substituted ureas locked in an (E,Z) conformation

T2 - an unusual anion binding via supramolecular assembly" by B. Ośmiałowski and E. Kolehmainen, New J. Chem., 2014, 38, DOI: 10.1039/c3nj01282d

AU - Caltagirone, Claudia

AU - Garau, Alessandra

AU - Isaia, Francesco

AU - Lippolis, Vito

AU - Montis, Riccardo

AU - Olivari, Martina

AU - Scorciapino, Mariano Andrea

PY - 2014/2/26

Y1 - 2014/2/26

N2 - We reply to the comments raised by Ośmiałowski and Kolehmainen in their discussion on conformations of ureidic receptors as set out in our article (M. Olivari et al., New J. Chem., 2013, 37, 663-669). Here we appreciate the common views we share and welcome the clarity this gives, and we discuss and question some of their criticisms of the original paper and clarify our opinion in this area.

AB - We reply to the comments raised by Ośmiałowski and Kolehmainen in their discussion on conformations of ureidic receptors as set out in our article (M. Olivari et al., New J. Chem., 2013, 37, 663-669). Here we appreciate the common views we share and welcome the clarity this gives, and we discuss and question some of their criticisms of the original paper and clarify our opinion in this area.

KW - acetic acid

KW - anion

KW - benzoic acid

KW - oxygen

KW - proton

KW - urea

KW - anisotropy

KW - conformation

KW - hydrogen bond

KW - hypothesis

KW - priority journal

KW - proton nuclear magnetic resonance

KW - review

KW - solid state

KW - supramolecular chemistry

KW - titrimetry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901044135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1039/c4nj00170b

DO - 10.1039/c4nj00170b

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84901044135

SN - 1144-0546

VL - 38

SP - 2704

EP - 2706

JO - New Journal of Chemistry

JF - New Journal of Chemistry

IS - 6

ER -

Caltagirone C, Garau A, Isaia F, Lippolis V, Montis R, Olivari M et al. Reply to the 'Comment on "non-symmetric substituted ureas locked in an (E,Z) conformation: an unusual anion binding via supramolecular assembly" by B. Ośmiałowski and E. Kolehmainen, New J. Chem., 2014, 38, DOI: 10.1039/c3nj01282d. New Journal of Chemistry. 2014 Feb 26;38(6):2704-2706. doi: 10.1039/c4nj00170b

Reply to the 'Comment on "non-symmetric substituted ureas locked in an (E,Z) conformation: an unusual anion binding via supramolecular assembly" by B. Ośmiałowski and E. Kolehmainen, New J. Chem., 2014, 38, DOI: 10.1039/c3nj01282d

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this