Reply to the 'Comment on "non-symmetric substituted ureas locked in an (E,Z) conformation: an unusual anion binding via supramolecular assembly" by B. Ośmiałowski and E. Kolehmainen, New J. Chem., 2014, 38, DOI: 10.1039/c3nj01282d

Claudia Caltagirone, Alessandra Garau, Francesco Isaia, Vito Lippolis, Riccardo Montis, Martina Olivari, Mariano Andrea Scorciapino

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    Abstract

    We reply to the comments raised by Ośmiałowski and Kolehmainen in their discussion on conformations of ureidic receptors as set out in our article (M. Olivari et al., New J. Chem., 2013, 37, 663-669). Here we appreciate the common views we share and welcome the clarity this gives, and we discuss and question some of their criticisms of the original paper and clarify our opinion in this area.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2704-2706
    Number of pages3
    JournalNew Journal of Chemistry
    Volume38
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 26 Feb 2014

    Keywords

    • acetic acid
    • anion
    • benzoic acid
    • oxygen
    • proton
    • urea
    • anisotropy
    • conformation
    • hydrogen bond
    • hypothesis
    • priority journal
    • proton nuclear magnetic resonance
    • review
    • solid state
    • supramolecular chemistry
    • titrimetry

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to the 'Comment on "non-symmetric substituted ureas locked in an (E,Z) conformation: an unusual anion binding via supramolecular assembly" by B. Ośmiałowski and E. Kolehmainen, New J. Chem., 2014, 38, DOI: 10.1039/c3nj01282d'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this