TY - JOUR
T1 - Report from the hand osteoarthritis working group at OMERACT 2018
T2 - Update on core instrument set development
AU - Wittoek, Ruth
AU - Kroon, Féline P.B.
AU - Kundakci, Burak
AU - Abhishek, Abhishek
AU - Haugen, Ida K.
AU - Berenbaum, Francis
AU - Conaghan, Philip G.
AU - Ishimori, Mariko L.
AU - Smeets, Wilma
AU - Van Der Heijde, Désirée
AU - Kloppenburg, Margreet
N1 - Funding Information:
PGC is supported in part by the UK NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre.
Funding Information:
From the Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Rheumatology, and Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Division of Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham; National Institute for Health Research, Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham; Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK; Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Rheumatology, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Saint-Antoine Hospital AP-HP, DHU i2B, Paris, France; Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA. PGC is supported in part by the UK NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre. R. Wittoek, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University; F.P. Kroon, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center; B. Kundakci, PT, MSc, Division of Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham; A. Abhishek, MD, MRCP, PhD, Division of Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, and National Institute for Health Research, Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre; I.K. Haugen, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital; F. Berenbaum, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Saint-Antoine hospital AP-HP, DHU i2B; P.G. Conaghan MBBS, PhD, FRACP, FRCP, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and National Institute for Health Research, Leeds Biomedical Research Centre; M.L. Ishimori, MD, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; W. Smeets, Patient Representative, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center; D. van der Heijde, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center; M. Kloppenburg, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, and Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center. Address correspondence to Dr. M. Kloppenburg, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] Accepted for publication November 14, 2018.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Journal of Rheumatology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/9/1
Y1 - 2019/9/1
N2 - Objective: To evaluate hand osteoarthritis tools for core instrument set development. Methods: For OMERACT 2018, a systematic literature review and advances in instrument validation were presented. Results: Visual analog and numerical rating scales were considered valuable for pain and patient's global assessment, despite heterogeneous phrasing and missing psychometric evidence for some aspects. The Modified Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain scale was lacking evidence. The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire had advantages above other pain/function questionnaires. The Hand Mobility in Scleroderma scale was valid, although responsiveness was questioned. Potential joint activity instruments were evaluated. Conclusion: The development of the core instrument set is progressing, and a research agenda was also developed.
AB - Objective: To evaluate hand osteoarthritis tools for core instrument set development. Methods: For OMERACT 2018, a systematic literature review and advances in instrument validation were presented. Results: Visual analog and numerical rating scales were considered valuable for pain and patient's global assessment, despite heterogeneous phrasing and missing psychometric evidence for some aspects. The Modified Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain scale was lacking evidence. The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire had advantages above other pain/function questionnaires. The Hand Mobility in Scleroderma scale was valid, although responsiveness was questioned. Potential joint activity instruments were evaluated. Conclusion: The development of the core instrument set is progressing, and a research agenda was also developed.
KW - Hand osteoarthritis
KW - Omeract
KW - outcome measurement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071724872&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3899/jrheum.181003
DO - 10.3899/jrheum.181003
M3 - Article
C2 - 30647176
AN - SCOPUS:85071724872
SN - 0315-162X
VL - 46
SP - 1183
EP - 1187
JO - Journal of Rheumatology
JF - Journal of Rheumatology
IS - 9
ER -