Reporting methodological items in randomized experiments in political science

Isabelle Boutron, Peter John, David J. Torgerson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article discusses the arguments for using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) procedures in political science field experiments, with the aim of improving the clarity and transparency of research work and reducing the possibility of bias. The article reviews the background to CONSORT, which is increasingly required for carrying out and reporting trials in healthcare and other disciplines. It sets out the main elements of the scheme and then applies its criteria to evaluate a published Get Out the Vote (GOTV) study by John and Brannan (2008). The CONSORT checklist shows the methods in this article to be clear and transparent but that CONSORT could improve the reporting of turnout experiments, such as details of the numbers going through the trial at each stage. The article argues that applying CONSORT to reports of trials in political science journals is a feasible and desirable objective.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)112-131
Number of pages19
JournalAnnals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Volume628
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2010

Keywords

  • CONSORT
  • Field experiments
  • Trials
  • Voter turnout

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reporting methodological items in randomized experiments in political science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this