Rescuing human embryonic stem cell research: The possibility of embryo reconstitution after stem cell derivation

Katrien Devolder, Christopher M. Ward

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    We discuss in this essay the alternative techniques proposed for the isolation of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) that attempt to satisfy moral issues surrounding killing embryos but show that these techniques are either redundant or do not achieve their intended aim. We discuss the difficulties associated with defining a human embryo and how the lack of clarity on this issue antagonises the ethical debate and impedes hESC research. We present scientific evidence showing that isolation of hESCs does not necessarily "kill" human embryos. In addition, we argue that even those who accord inviolable moral status to the embryo should agree that hESC research is morally obligatory, as it is beneficial to the developmental potential of the embryo and society as a whole. © 2007 Metaphilosophy LLC and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)245-263
    Number of pages18
    JournalMetaphilosophy
    Volume38
    Issue number2-3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Keywords

    • Altered nuclear transfer
    • Embryo
    • Embryonic stem cell research
    • Moral status

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Rescuing human embryonic stem cell research: The possibility of embryo reconstitution after stem cell derivation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this