TY - GEN
T1 - Resilient Control of Power Electronic Converters Under Sensor and Control Input Uncertainty
AU - Jamali, Mahmood
AU - Sadabadi, Mahdieh S.
AU - Sahoo, Subham
AU - Zhang, Yichao
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - This paper proposes an innovative adaptive vector current control scheme designed for power converter systems. Even with efficient upper-layer control strategies in place in modernized power grids, vulnerabilities remain at the primary control level (or device level), exposing inverter-based resources (IBRs) to cyber attacks or other forms of uncertainties. The control objective is to mitigate the destructive effects of sensor and control input uncertainty. The theoretical framework of Lyapunov theory is employed for stability analysis and to prove the uniform boundedness of the power converter closed-loop control system. Although developed for three-phase 2-level gridfollowing IBRs, the approach is broadly applicable to various power converters such as 2-level, modular multilevel converters, and solid-state transformers, as long as their dynamic models can be linearized. This makes it a versatile solution for enhancing security across a range of power electronic converter systems. Comparative simulations highlight the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed adaptive control scheme.
AB - This paper proposes an innovative adaptive vector current control scheme designed for power converter systems. Even with efficient upper-layer control strategies in place in modernized power grids, vulnerabilities remain at the primary control level (or device level), exposing inverter-based resources (IBRs) to cyber attacks or other forms of uncertainties. The control objective is to mitigate the destructive effects of sensor and control input uncertainty. The theoretical framework of Lyapunov theory is employed for stability analysis and to prove the uniform boundedness of the power converter closed-loop control system. Although developed for three-phase 2-level gridfollowing IBRs, the approach is broadly applicable to various power converters such as 2-level, modular multilevel converters, and solid-state transformers, as long as their dynamic models can be linearized. This makes it a versatile solution for enhancing security across a range of power electronic converter systems. Comparative simulations highlight the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed adaptive control scheme.
KW - Adaptive control scheme
KW - sensor and control input uncertainty
KW - three-phase grid-following (GFL) inverterbased resources (IBRs)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85216583157&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/DMC62632.2024.10812140
DO - 10.1109/DMC62632.2024.10812140
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85216583157
T3 - 2024 IEEE Design Methodologies Conference, DMC 2024
BT - 2024 IEEE Design Methodologies Conference, DMC 2024
PB - IEEE
T2 - 2024 IEEE Design Methodologies Conference, DMC 2024
Y2 - 18 November 2024 through 20 November 2024
ER -