Responding to project uncertainty: Evidence for high reliability practices in large-scale safety-critical projects

Fiona Saunders, Andrew Gale, Andrew Sherry

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    308 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In large-scale safety-critical projects unforeseen events and uncertainties must be carefully managed to safeguard the integrity of the end product and deliver projects to time and cost. Based on 47 ‘vignettes’ of uncertainty across projects in two safety-critical sectors, this study provides an empirical examination of whether practices consistent with theories of high reliability organising are adopted by project managers as a response to project uncertainty. Our findings are that confronting uncertainties in safety-critical projects does involve many high reliability practices. Respondents expressed a sense of balancing competing demands, and provided evidence of learning, acting mindfully, avoiding over-rigid processes, and of upholding constructive tensions, conceptual slack and close interdisciplinary working.
    However these practices are often fragile in nature and dependent on key individuals. There are also differences between the two sectors studied, with more widespread evidence of high reliability project organising in civil nuclear than in aerospace projects
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1252–1265
    JournalInternational Journal of Project Management
    Volume34
    Issue number7
    Early online date9 Jul 2016
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2016

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Responding to project uncertainty: Evidence for high reliability practices in large-scale safety-critical projects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this