Response to: Is it the modulus or the method that matters?

Research output: Contribution to journal › Commentary/debate › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	521
Journal	Clinical & experimental optometry
Volume	92
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-0938.2009.00428.x
Publication status	Published - Nov 2009

Keywords

@article{fd3fcef6b332402eb4d1c4c406c4f12d,

title = "Response to: Is it the modulus or the method that matters?",

keywords = "Contact Lenses/adverse effects, Elastic Modulus, Humans, Hypoxia/etiology, Keratitis/etiology",

author = "Nathan Efron and Philip Morgan",

year = "2009",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1111/j.1444-0938.2009.00428.x",

language = "English",

volume = "92",

pages = "521",

journal = "Clinical & experimental optometry",

issn = "0816-4622",