Restorative justice in children

Katrin Riedl, Keith Jensen, Josep Call, Michael Tomasello

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    107 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    An important, and perhaps uniquely human, mechanism for maintaining cooperation against free riders is third-party punishment [ 1, 2 ]. Our closest living relatives, chimpanzees, will not punish third parties even though they will do so when personally affected [ 3 ]. Until recently, little attention has been paid to how punishment and a sense of justice develop in children. Children respond to norm violations [ 4 ]. They are more likely to share with a puppet that helped another individual as opposed to one who behaved harmfully, and they show a preference for seeing a harmful doll rather than a victim punished [ 5 ]. By 6 years of age, children will pay a cost to punish fictional and real peers [ 6–8 ], and the threat of punishment will lead preschoolers to behave more generously [ 9 ]. However, little is known about what motivates a sense of justice in children. We gave 3- and 5-year-old children—the youngest ages yet tested—the opportunity to remove items and prevent a puppet from gaining a reward for second- and third-party violations (experiment 1), and we gave 3-year-olds the opportunity to restore items (experiment 2). Children were as likely to engage in third-party interventions as they were when personally affected, yet they did not discriminate among the different sources of harm for the victim. When given a range of options, 3-year-olds chose restoration over removal. It appears that a sense of justice centered on harm caused to victims emerges early in childhood and highlights the value of third-party interventions for human cooperation.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1731-1735
    Number of pages4
    JournalCurrent Biology
    Volume25
    Issue number13
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 18 Jun 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Restorative justice in children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this