Retributive, restorative and ritualistic justice

Kimberley Brownlee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Few defences of retribution in criminal justice make a plausible case for the view that punishment plays a necessary role in restoring relations between offenders, victims and the community. Even fewer defences of retribution make a plausible appeal to the interpersonal practice of apologizing as a symbolically adequate model for criminal justice. This review article considers Christopher Bennett's engaging defence of an apology ritual in criminal justice, an account of justifiable punishment that draws from the best of retributive and restorative justice theory. © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected].
Original languageEnglish
Article numbergqq006
Pages (from-to)385-397
Number of pages12
JournalOxford Journal of Legal Studies
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Mar 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Retributive, restorative and ritualistic justice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this