Abstract
This article addresses the issue of parametric non-congruence as it affects the articulation of closure in the first movement of Schubert's String Quartet in C major, D.46. This movement displays to formal irregularities which render it problematic in relation to sonata theory: first, the presentation of new thematic material in the exposition does not correspond with a modulation to the dominant key, and second, the recapitulation of the primary theme commences over an active 6-4 bass progression. As such, D.46/i provides an apt setting for an appraisal of how effective sonata theory is in the treatment and understanding of closure when the very elements which ought to express it are ostensibly incompatible. The distinction I draw between tonal (syntactic) and rhetorical (semantic) closure in this article (founded in the work of Kofi Agawu, among others) aims at demonstrating that the adherence to a hierarchical perspective of form in which tonality dominates is of little service when examining a work in which local cadential closure is persistently evaded. Ultimately, my analysis shall demonstrate the through-composed design of this movement and, in so doing, question the unrelenting reliance on cadence and contrapuntal closure as delineators of sonata space.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 111-142 |
Number of pages | 31 |
Journal | Music Analysis |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | i |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2009 |
Keywords
- Schubert
- String Quartet
- Sonata Theory
- Parametric non-congruence
- Closure