TY - JOUR
T1 - Rights based approaches to forest landscape restoration: learning from the Indian forest policy experience
AU - Govindarajulu, Dhanapal
AU - Pritchard, Rose
AU - Chhatre, A.
AU - Foster, Timothy
AU - Oldekop, Johan
PY - 2023/12/1
Y1 - 2023/12/1
N2 - Secure rights and tenure are considered essential components for socially just forest landscape restoration (FLR). Through a content analysis of India's forest policies, we identify enabling factors and challenges for rights based FLR. We discuss the practical implications of these enabling factors and barriers for FLR in India using evidence from the literature. We find that policies like the Forest Rights Act (FRA) and the Panchayat Extension of Scheduled Areas (PESA) Act support rights based FLR by providing communities with secure forest management rights and ownership of forest products. However, other policies, such as the Compensatory Afforestation Fund Act, can act antagonistically and weaken community rights in FLR. From our analysis, we draw three key lessons for rights based FLR in India and globally. First, there is a need to identify and resolve conflicts among forest policies that undermine rights and affect community participation in FLR. Second, policies must go beyond providing a potential for claiming rights and make claiming rights actionable in practice. Third, there is a need for a greater focus on promoting FLR mechanisms that allow communities to participate in FLR decision-making with their full set of recognised rights, including in the design of FLR activities that align with community preferences and needs.
AB - Secure rights and tenure are considered essential components for socially just forest landscape restoration (FLR). Through a content analysis of India's forest policies, we identify enabling factors and challenges for rights based FLR. We discuss the practical implications of these enabling factors and barriers for FLR in India using evidence from the literature. We find that policies like the Forest Rights Act (FRA) and the Panchayat Extension of Scheduled Areas (PESA) Act support rights based FLR by providing communities with secure forest management rights and ownership of forest products. However, other policies, such as the Compensatory Afforestation Fund Act, can act antagonistically and weaken community rights in FLR. From our analysis, we draw three key lessons for rights based FLR in India and globally. First, there is a need to identify and resolve conflicts among forest policies that undermine rights and affect community participation in FLR. Second, policies must go beyond providing a potential for claiming rights and make claiming rights actionable in practice. Third, there is a need for a greater focus on promoting FLR mechanisms that allow communities to participate in FLR decision-making with their full set of recognised rights, including in the design of FLR activities that align with community preferences and needs.
KW - Communities
KW - Forest restoration
KW - Forest rights
KW - India
KW - Policies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173742125&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/e5d1b78c-586f-3047-baf7-0ba7d4c573fa/
U2 - 10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103073
DO - 10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103073
M3 - Article
SN - 1389-9341
VL - 157
JO - Forest Policy and Economics
JF - Forest Policy and Economics
M1 - 103073
ER -