Risk adjusted surgical audit in gynaecological oncology: P-POSSUM does not predict outcome

N. Das, A. S. Talaat, R. Naik, A. D. Lopes, K. A. Godfrey, M. H. Hatem, R. J. Edmondson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    Aims: To assess the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) and its validity for use in gynaecological oncology surgery. Methods: All patients undergoing gynaecological oncology surgery at the Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre (NGOC) Gateshead, UK over a period of 12 months (2002-2003) were assessed prospectively. Mortality and morbidity predictions using the Portsmouth modification of the POSSUM algorithm (P-POSSUM) were compared to the actual outcomes. Performance of the model was also evaluated using the Hosmer and Lemeshow Chi square statistic (testing the goodness of fit). Results: During this period 468 patients were assessed. The P-POSSUM appeared to over predict mortality rates for our patients. It predicted a 7% mortality rate for our patients compared to an observed rate of 2% (35 predicted deaths in comparison to 10 observed deaths), a difference that was statistically significant (H&L χ2 = 542.9, d.f. 8, p <0.05). Conclusion: The P-POSSUM algorithm overestimates the risk of mortality for gynaecological oncology patients undergoing surgery. The P-POSSUM algorithm will require further adjustments prior to adoption for gynaecological cancer surgery as a risk adjusted surgical audit tool. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1135-1138
    Number of pages3
    JournalEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology
    Issue number10
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2006


    • Gynaecological oncology surgery
    • P-POSSUM
    • Surgical audit


    Dive into the research topics of 'Risk adjusted surgical audit in gynaecological oncology: P-POSSUM does not predict outcome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this