Risk factors for clinical coronary heart disease in systemic lupus erythematosus: The Lupus and Atherosclerosis Evaluation of Risk (LASER) study

Sahena Haque, Caroline Gordon, David Isenberg, Anisur Rahman, Peter Lanyon, Aubrey Bell, Paul Emery, Neil McHugh, Lee Suan Teh, David G I Scott, Mohamed Akil, Sophia Naz, Jacqueline Andrews, Bridget Griffiths, Helen Harris, Hazem Youssef, John McLaren, Veronica Toescu, Vinodh Devakumar, Jamal TeirIan N. Bruce

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Objective. Accelerated atherosclerosis and premature coronary heart disease (CHD) are recognized complications of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but the exact etiology remains unclear and is likely to be multifactorial.We hypothesized that SLE patients with CHD have increased exposure to traditional risk factors as well as differing disease phenotype and therapy-related factors compared to SLE patients free of CHD. Our aim was to examine risk factors for development of clinical CHD in SLE in the clinical setting. Methods. In a UK-wide multicenter retrospective case-control study we recruited 53 SLE patients with verified clinical CHD (myocardial infarction or angina pectoris) and 96 SLE patients without clinical CHD. Controls were recruited from the same center as the case and matched by disease duration. Charts were reviewed up to time of event for cases, or the same "dummy-date" in controls. Results. SLE patients with clinical CHD were older at the time of event [mean (SD) 53 (10) vs 42 (10) yrs; p <0.001], more likely to be male [11 (20%) vs 3 (7%); p <0.001], and had more exposure to all classic CHD risk factors compared to SLE patients without clinical CHD. They were also more likely to have been treated with corticosteroids (OR 2.46; 95% CI 1.03, 5.88) and azathioprine (OR 2.33; 95% CI 1.16, 4.67) and to have evidence of damage on the pre-event SLICC damage index (SDI) (OR 2.20; 95% CI 1.09, 4.44). There was no difference between groups with regard to clinical organ involvement or autoantibody profile. Conclusion. Our study highlights the need for clinical vigilance to identify modifiable risk factors in the clinical setting and in particular with male patients. The pattern of organ involvement did not differ in SLE patients with CHD events. However, the higher pre-event SDI, azathioprine exposure, and pattern of damage items (disease-related rather than therapy-related) in cases suggests that a persistent active lupus phenotype contributes to CHD risk. In this regard, corticosteroids and azathioprine may not control disease well enough to prevent CHD. Clinical trials are needed to determine whether classic risk factor modification will have a role in primary prevention of CHD in SLE patients and whether new therapies that control disease activity can better reduce CHD risk. The Journal of Rheumatology Copyright © 2010. All rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)322-329
    Number of pages7
    JournalJournal of Rheumatology
    Volume37
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2010

    Keywords

    • Coronary heart disease
    • Disease activity
    • Risk factors
    • Systemic lupus erythematosus

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Risk factors for clinical coronary heart disease in systemic lupus erythematosus: The Lupus and Atherosclerosis Evaluation of Risk (LASER) study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this