Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Risk of extended major adverse cardiovascular event endpoints with tofacitinib versus TNF inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a post hoc analysis of a phase 3b/4 randomised safety study

  • Maya H Buch
  • , Deepak L Bhatt
  • , Christina Charles-Schoeman
  • , Jon T Giles
  • , Ted Mikuls
  • , Gary G Koch
  • , Steven Ytterberg
  • , Edward Nagy
  • , Hyejin Jo
  • , Kenneth Kwok
  • , Carol A Connell
  • , Karim Richard Masri
  • , Arne Yndestad
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • University of California
  • Columbia University
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center
  • The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Mayo Clinic (HQ)
  • Pfizer Ltd
  • Pfizer Inc
  • Pfizer Inc

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Compare the risk of extended major adverse cardiovascular (CV) event (MACE) composite outcomes and component events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tofacitinib versus tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in Oral Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial (ORAL) Surveillance.

METHODS: Patients with RA aged ≥50 years and with ≥1 additional CV risk factor received tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg two times per day or TNFi. MACE (non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), non-fatal stroke or CV death (MACE-3)) was extended by sequential addition of CV events (hospitalisation for unstable angina (MACE-4), coronary revascularisation (MACE-5), transient ischaemic attack (MACE-6), peripheral vascular disease (MACE-7)), heart failure (HF) hospitalisation (MACE-8) and venous thromboembolism (VTE; (MACE-8 plus VTE)). HRs (tofacitinib vs TNFi) were evaluated for MACE and individual components.

RESULTS: HRs for MACE-4 to MACE-8 with combined and individual tofacitinib doses versus TNFi were similar. Risk of MACE-8 plus VTE appeared similar with tofacitinib 5 mg two times per day versus TNFi (HR 1.12 (0.82 to 1.52)), but higher with tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day versus TNFi (HR 1.38 (1.02 to 1.85)). Risk of MI was higher with tofacitinib versus TNFi, but difference in risk of other individual CV events was not suggested. Across extended MACE definitions, risk appeared higher with tofacitinib versus TNFi in those with atherosclerotic CV disease or age ≥65 years.

CONCLUSION: In ORAL Surveillance, risk of composite CV endpoints combining all ischaemic CV events and HF did not appear different with tofacitinib versus TNFi. The totality of CV risk was higher with tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day versus TNFi, driven by an increase in VTE.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02092467.

Original languageEnglish
JournalRMD Open
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Apr 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications
  • Heart Failure
  • Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology
  • Piperidines/adverse effects
  • Pyrimidines
  • Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors
  • Venous Thromboembolism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Risk of extended major adverse cardiovascular event endpoints with tofacitinib versus TNF inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a post hoc analysis of a phase 3b/4 randomised safety study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this