TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in patients with rare melanoma subtypes who progressed on or after ipilimumab treatment: a single-arm, open-label, phase II study (CheckMate 172)
AU - Nathan, Paul
AU - Ascierto, Paolo A.
AU - Haanen, John
AU - Espinosa, Enrique
AU - Demidov, Lev
AU - Garbe, Claus
AU - Guida, Michele
AU - Lorigan, Paul
AU - Chiarion-Sileni, Vanna
AU - Gogas, Helen
AU - Maio, Michele
AU - Fierro, Maria Teresa
AU - Hoeller, Christoph
AU - Terheyden, Patrick
AU - Gutzmer, Ralf
AU - Guren, Tormod K.
AU - Bafaloukos, Dimitrios
AU - Rutkowski, Piotr
AU - Plummer, Ruth
AU - Waterston, Ashita
AU - Kaatz, Martin
AU - Mandala, Mario
AU - Marquez-Rodas, Ivan
AU - Muñoz-Couselo, Eva
AU - Dummer, Reinhard
AU - Grigoryeva, Elena
AU - Young, Tina C.
AU - Schadendorf, Dirk
PY - 2019/9/1
Y1 - 2019/9/1
N2 - Background: Nivolumab has been widely studied in non-acral cutaneous melanoma; however, limited data are available in other melanoma subtypes. We report outcomes by melanoma subtype in patients who received nivolumab after progression on prior ipilimumab. Patients and methods: CheckMate 172 was a phase II, single-arm, open-label, multicentre study that evaluated nivolumab in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed on or after ipilimumab. Patients received 3 mg/kg of nivolumab, every 2 weeks for up to 2 years. The primary end-point was incidence of grade ≥3, treatment-related select adverse events (AEs). Results: Among 1008 treated patients, we report data on patients with non-acral cutaneous melanoma (n = 723 [71.7%]), ocular melanoma (n = 103 [10.2%]), mucosal melanoma (n = 63 [6.3%]), acral cutaneous melanoma (n = 55 [5.5%]) and other melanoma subtypes (n = 64 [6.3%]). There were no meaningful differences in the incidence of grade ≥3, treatment-related select AEs among melanoma subtypes or compared with the total population. No new safety signals emerged. At a minimum follow-up of 18 months, median overall survival was 25.3 months for non-acral cutaneous melanoma and 25.8 months for acral cutaneous melanoma, with 18-month overall survival rates of 57.5% and 59.0%, respectively. Median overall survival was 12.6 months for ocular melanoma and 11.5 months for mucosal melanoma, with 18-month overall survival rates of 34.8% and 31.5%, respectively. Conclusions: The safety profile of nivolumab after ipilimumab is similar across melanoma subtypes. Compared with non-acral cutaneous melanoma, patients with acral cutaneous melanoma had similar survival outcomes, whereas those with ocular and mucosal melanoma had lower median overall survival. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: : NCT02156804.
AB - Background: Nivolumab has been widely studied in non-acral cutaneous melanoma; however, limited data are available in other melanoma subtypes. We report outcomes by melanoma subtype in patients who received nivolumab after progression on prior ipilimumab. Patients and methods: CheckMate 172 was a phase II, single-arm, open-label, multicentre study that evaluated nivolumab in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed on or after ipilimumab. Patients received 3 mg/kg of nivolumab, every 2 weeks for up to 2 years. The primary end-point was incidence of grade ≥3, treatment-related select adverse events (AEs). Results: Among 1008 treated patients, we report data on patients with non-acral cutaneous melanoma (n = 723 [71.7%]), ocular melanoma (n = 103 [10.2%]), mucosal melanoma (n = 63 [6.3%]), acral cutaneous melanoma (n = 55 [5.5%]) and other melanoma subtypes (n = 64 [6.3%]). There were no meaningful differences in the incidence of grade ≥3, treatment-related select AEs among melanoma subtypes or compared with the total population. No new safety signals emerged. At a minimum follow-up of 18 months, median overall survival was 25.3 months for non-acral cutaneous melanoma and 25.8 months for acral cutaneous melanoma, with 18-month overall survival rates of 57.5% and 59.0%, respectively. Median overall survival was 12.6 months for ocular melanoma and 11.5 months for mucosal melanoma, with 18-month overall survival rates of 34.8% and 31.5%, respectively. Conclusions: The safety profile of nivolumab after ipilimumab is similar across melanoma subtypes. Compared with non-acral cutaneous melanoma, patients with acral cutaneous melanoma had similar survival outcomes, whereas those with ocular and mucosal melanoma had lower median overall survival. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: : NCT02156804.
KW - Acral
KW - Advanced melanoma
KW - Ipilimumab
KW - Mucosal
KW - Nivolumab
KW - Ocular
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.07.010
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.07.010
M3 - Article
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 119
SP - 168
EP - 178
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
ER -