TY - JOUR
T1 - Scenarios of world development
AU - Cole, Sam
AU - Gershuny, Jay
AU - Miles, Ian
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors are all members of the Science Policy Research Unit at the University of Sussex, Brighton, Sussex, UK. The methodological approach described in this article was developed as part of a study-supported by the Social Science Research Council and the Leverhulme Trust-at SPRU which will be published as WorldFakes: The Great De&e (London, Martin Robertson, forthcoming 1978) under the editorship of Professors Chris Freeman and Marie Jahoda. The figures and tables in this article are based on those which will appear in the published study. t These studies are referenced in a short bibliography at the end of the article.
Copyright:
Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1978/2
Y1 - 1978/2
N2 - This article looks at 16 recent studies of global futures and examines their conclusions within a sociopolitical framework.† † These studies are referenced in a short bibliography at the end of the article. Three idealised worldviews-conservative, reformist, radical-are constructed from this framework; they are then married with a classification based upon the two parameters of high growth-low growth and equality-inequality. This allows for the concise mapping of existing scenarios and, by the elucidation of the major differences in sociopolitical forecasts, provides a simple but effective technique for comparative analysis. Two quality-of-life issues, the future of work, and of political development and change, are used as concrete examples of how the method can be used to create a series of scenarios which cover the whole socio-political spectrum of alternative futures.
AB - This article looks at 16 recent studies of global futures and examines their conclusions within a sociopolitical framework.† † These studies are referenced in a short bibliography at the end of the article. Three idealised worldviews-conservative, reformist, radical-are constructed from this framework; they are then married with a classification based upon the two parameters of high growth-low growth and equality-inequality. This allows for the concise mapping of existing scenarios and, by the elucidation of the major differences in sociopolitical forecasts, provides a simple but effective technique for comparative analysis. Two quality-of-life issues, the future of work, and of political development and change, are used as concrete examples of how the method can be used to create a series of scenarios which cover the whole socio-political spectrum of alternative futures.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0142130237&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0016-3287(78)90139-8
DO - 10.1016/0016-3287(78)90139-8
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0142130237
SN - 0016-3287
VL - 10
SP - 3
EP - 20
JO - Futures
JF - Futures
IS - 1
ER -