Scholar/activists and regimes of truth: Rethinking the divide between universities and the streets

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Challenging the divide between political activism in the streets and in the University that is frequently made by US academics, this commentary links insights about regimes of truth to the concept of scholar/activism. Three different forms of scholar activism are delineated: (1) direct political engagement; (2) acting as a public intellectual; and (3) creating a critical scholarship that directly challenges the dominant theoretical frameworks, solipsisms, mystifications, and silences that underlie neoliberal regimes of truth. The article notes that opposition to methodological nationalism is key to a scholar/activism relevant to world-wide struggles against oppression. It highlights an emerging subaltern cosmopolitanism that draws on experiential histories of oppression to bring together simultaneous cultural rootedness and openness to common aspirations for social and economic justice. © 2011 by the American Anthropological Association.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)162-164
Number of pages2
JournalTransforming Anthropology
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2011

Keywords

  • Antionio Lauria
  • Methodological nationalism
  • Regimes of truth
  • Scholar activism
  • Subaltern cosmopolitanism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Scholar/activists and regimes of truth: Rethinking the divide between universities and the streets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this