Abstract
Background
Generalisability and transportability of clinical prediction models (CPMs) refer to their ability to maintain predictive performance when applied to new populations. While CPMs may show good generalisability or transportability to a specific new population, it is rare for a CPM to be developed using methods that prioritise good generalisability or transportability. There is an emerging literature of such techniques; therefore, this scoping review aims to summarise the main methodological approaches, assumptions, advantages, disadvantages and future development of methodology aiding the generalisability and transportability of CPMs.
Methods
Relevant articles were systematically searched from MEDLINE, Embase, medRxiv, arxiv databases until August 2023 using a predefined set of search terms. Extracted information included methodology description, assumptions, applied examples, advantages and disadvantages.
Results
The searches found 1,761 articles; 172 were retained for full text screening; 18 were finally included. We categorised the methodologies based on whether they are data-driven or knowledge-driven, and whether they are generalisable or transportable to specific target population. Data-driven approaches range from data augmentation to ensemble methods and density ratio weighting, while knowledge-driven strategies rely on causal methodology.
Conclusions
Future research could focus on comparing these methodologies across simulated and real datasets to identify their strengths and weaknesses in broad applications, as well as synthesising these approaches for enhancing their practical usefulness.
Generalisability and transportability of clinical prediction models (CPMs) refer to their ability to maintain predictive performance when applied to new populations. While CPMs may show good generalisability or transportability to a specific new population, it is rare for a CPM to be developed using methods that prioritise good generalisability or transportability. There is an emerging literature of such techniques; therefore, this scoping review aims to summarise the main methodological approaches, assumptions, advantages, disadvantages and future development of methodology aiding the generalisability and transportability of CPMs.
Methods
Relevant articles were systematically searched from MEDLINE, Embase, medRxiv, arxiv databases until August 2023 using a predefined set of search terms. Extracted information included methodology description, assumptions, applied examples, advantages and disadvantages.
Results
The searches found 1,761 articles; 172 were retained for full text screening; 18 were finally included. We categorised the methodologies based on whether they are data-driven or knowledge-driven, and whether they are generalisable or transportable to specific target population. Data-driven approaches range from data augmentation to ensemble methods and density ratio weighting, while knowledge-driven strategies rely on causal methodology.
Conclusions
Future research could focus on comparing these methodologies across simulated and real datasets to identify their strengths and weaknesses in broad applications, as well as synthesising these approaches for enhancing their practical usefulness.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Diagnostic and Prognostic Research |
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - 26 Aug 2026 |
Keywords
- generalisability
- transportability
- clinical prediction models
- causal inference
- dataset shift
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Scoping review of methodology for aiding generalisability and transportability of clinical prediction models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver