TY - JOUR
T1 - Selective opportunistic screening for hypercholesterolemia in primary care practice.
AU - Hutchison, B
AU - Birch, S
AU - Evans, CE
AU - Goldsmith, LJ
AU - Barbara, A.
AU - Markham, BA
AU - Frank, J
AU - Paterson, M
PY - 1998/10
Y1 - 1998/10
N2 - Objectives: To assess the performance of selective opportunistic screening in a primary care group practice. Design: Cross-sectional survey of coronary heart disease risk factors and retrospective chart audit of cholesterol testing. Setting: Capitation-funded primary care group practice in Ontario, Canada. Subjects: 7785 enrolled patients between the ages of 20 and 69 years. Intervention: Protocol-based selective opportunistic screening program for hypercholesterolemia of 45 months duration. Main Outcome Measures: Targeting (proportion of screening tests that were appropriate), coverage (proportion of those meeting screening criteria who had a screening test performed), over-screening (proportion of those not meeting screening criteria who had a screening test performed), and screening ratio (likelihood that a screening test was performed on an individual who met screening criteria rather than one who failed to meet screening criteria). Results: 64.7% of patients tested met the practice criteria for screening. 37.7% of patients who met the practice screening criteria were tested and 24.9% of those not meeting practice screening criteria had a cholesterol test performed. The screening ratio was 1.52. Conclusion: Our findings bring into question the effectiveness of opportunistic approaches to preventive care.
AB - Objectives: To assess the performance of selective opportunistic screening in a primary care group practice. Design: Cross-sectional survey of coronary heart disease risk factors and retrospective chart audit of cholesterol testing. Setting: Capitation-funded primary care group practice in Ontario, Canada. Subjects: 7785 enrolled patients between the ages of 20 and 69 years. Intervention: Protocol-based selective opportunistic screening program for hypercholesterolemia of 45 months duration. Main Outcome Measures: Targeting (proportion of screening tests that were appropriate), coverage (proportion of those meeting screening criteria who had a screening test performed), over-screening (proportion of those not meeting screening criteria who had a screening test performed), and screening ratio (likelihood that a screening test was performed on an individual who met screening criteria rather than one who failed to meet screening criteria). Results: 64.7% of patients tested met the practice criteria for screening. 37.7% of patients who met the practice screening criteria were tested and 24.9% of those not meeting practice screening criteria had a cholesterol test performed. The screening ratio was 1.52. Conclusion: Our findings bring into question the effectiveness of opportunistic approaches to preventive care.
UR - http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/9762874
U2 - 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00068-7
DO - 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00068-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 9762874
SN - 0895-4356
JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
ER -