Self-Etch Silane Primer: Reactivity and Bonding with a Lithium Disilicate Ceramic

Maria Dimitriadi, Spiros Zinelis, Maria Zafiropoulou, Nick Silikas, George Eliades

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

95 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the stability, reactivity, and bond strength with a lithium disilicate ceramic of a self-etch silane primer (Monobond Etch and Prime/MEP). The stability was evaluated by 1H-,31P-NMR spectroscopy (before/after aging), and the reactivity by micro MIR-FTIR spectroscopy on Ge surfaces (0, 1, 24 h) using a prehydrolyzed silane primer (Calibra Silane Coupling Agent/CLB), as a control. The effect of MEP vs. 5% HF-etching on ceramic roughness was assessed by optical profilometry. The shear bond strength (SBS) of a resin composite bonded to polished ceramic surfaces treated with MEP, HF without silane (HF+NS), HF+CLB, and HF+MEP (n = 20) was evaluated after storage in water (A: 37 °C/1 week, B: 5000×/5–55 °C and C: 100 °C/24 h). Aging did not affect the silanol groups of MEP, but only the phosphate co-monomer. Silanols were reactive forming siloxanes, but exhibited lower consumption rate than CLB. HF-etching induced significantly higher values than MEP, in all the roughness parameters tested (Sa, Sz, Sdr, Sc, Sv), with the greatest differences found in Sdr and Sv. For SBS, MEP was inferior to all treatments/storage conditions, except of HF+NS in A, where the values were similar. However, on a HF-etched substrate, MEP provided highest strength and reliability.
Original languageEnglish
JournalMaterials
Volume13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jan 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Self-Etch Silane Primer: Reactivity and Bonding with a Lithium Disilicate Ceramic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this