TY - JOUR
T1 - Self-prioritization during stimulus processing is not obligatory
AU - Caughey, S.
AU - Falbén, J.K.
AU - Tsamadi, D.
AU - Persson, L.M.
AU - Golubickis, M.
AU - Neil Macrae, C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/3/1
Y1 - 2021/3/1
N2 - An emerging literature has suggested that self-relevance automatically enhances stimulus processing (i.e., the self-prioritization effect). Specifically, during shape–label matching tasks, geometric shapes associated with the self are identified more rapidly than comparable stimuli paired with other targets (e.g., friend, stranger). Replicating and extending work that challenges the putative automaticity of this effect, here we hypothesized that self-relevance facilitates stimulus processing only when task sets draw attention to previously formed shape–label associations in memory. The results of a shape-classification task confirmed this prediction. Compared to shapes associated with a friend, those paired with the self were classified more rapidly when participants were required to report who the stimulus denoted (i.e., self or friend). In contrast, self-relevance failed to facilitate performance when participants judged either what the shape was (i.e., triangle or square, diamond or circle) or where it was located on the screen (i.e., above or below fixation). These findings further elucidate the conditions under which self-relevance does—and does not—influence stimulus processing.
AB - An emerging literature has suggested that self-relevance automatically enhances stimulus processing (i.e., the self-prioritization effect). Specifically, during shape–label matching tasks, geometric shapes associated with the self are identified more rapidly than comparable stimuli paired with other targets (e.g., friend, stranger). Replicating and extending work that challenges the putative automaticity of this effect, here we hypothesized that self-relevance facilitates stimulus processing only when task sets draw attention to previously formed shape–label associations in memory. The results of a shape-classification task confirmed this prediction. Compared to shapes associated with a friend, those paired with the self were classified more rapidly when participants were required to report who the stimulus denoted (i.e., self or friend). In contrast, self-relevance failed to facilitate performance when participants judged either what the shape was (i.e., triangle or square, diamond or circle) or where it was located on the screen (i.e., above or below fixation). These findings further elucidate the conditions under which self-relevance does—and does not—influence stimulus processing.
KW - Adult
KW - Auditory Perception/physiology
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Psychomotor Performance/physiology
KW - Recognition, Psychology/physiology
KW - Self Concept
KW - Social Perception
KW - Young Adult
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85077689388&partnerID=MN8TOARS
U2 - 10.1007/s00426-019-01283-2
DO - 10.1007/s00426-019-01283-2
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31919569
SN - 0340-0727
VL - 85
SP - 503
EP - 508
JO - Psychological Research
JF - Psychological Research
IS - 2
ER -