Sensitivity of the association between increased lung cancer risk and bitumen fume exposure to the assumptions in the assessment of exposure

Frank de Vocht, Igor Burstyn, Gilles Ferro, Ann Olsson, Mia Hashibe, Hans Kromhout, Paolo Boffetta

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Purpose: A multi-centre IARC-coordinated European cohort study provided evidence of an association between lung cancer risk and bitumen fume exposure. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess whether these associations were robust to assumptions in the exposure assessment for which support could not be obtained due to lack of either measurements or direct observations. Methods: New exposure estimates were generated by changing assumptions on exposure levels, specific tasks, lags, and coal tar use. Subsequently, Poisson regression models estimated relative risks (RRs); change in fit of models was evaluated. Results: The influence of these assumptions was minimal, with log-likelihood deviations between -5.0 and 4.7% and similar patterns in dose-dependent increases of lung cancer risk. In the highest exposure categories, point estimates of RRs ranged 2.07-2.83 for average, and 1.22-2.23 for cumulative exposure. Conclusions: The small increase in lung cancer risk associated with bitumen fume exposure depends only to a limited extent on the subjective judgments made in the exposure assessment for this cohort. © Springer-Verlag 2008.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)723-733
    Number of pages10
    JournalInternational Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
    Volume82
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Keywords

    • Asphalt industry
    • Asphalt paving
    • Bitumen fume
    • Exposure assessment
    • Sensitivity analysis

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Sensitivity of the association between increased lung cancer risk and bitumen fume exposure to the assumptions in the assessment of exposure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this