Sexual satisfaction, quality of life and the transaction of intimacy in hospital patients' accounts of their (hetero)sexual relationships

Gavin Daker-White, Jenny Donovan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Twenty-three people attending hospitals in a city in southern England were interviewed to explore their perceptions and experiences of sexual dysfunction and satisfaction, and the relationship between these issues and subjective understandings of quality of life. Their responses are examined to inform theories concerning the relationship between intimacy and sexuality in heterosexual relationships. Disturbances to sexual function are framed by wider social realities and echo sociological understandings of disability and chronic illness. Informants' accounts utilised a mechanistic 'urge' model of sexuality, although issues of intimacy and emotion were central to their understandings of quality and satisfaction. Sexual activity in the relationship was understood as a mutual exchange of intimacy, suggesting a construction of sexual intercourse as a form of transaction between gendered sex 'workers', mimicking commodity relations. Accounts of the devastation brought by sexual dysfunction reflected highly socialised expectations of sexual performance. There is a need for further theoretical and empirical scrutiny of the relationship between sexual function and quality of life.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)89-113
    Number of pages24
    JournalSociology of Health and Illness
    Volume24
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2002

    Keywords

    • Gender relations
    • Heterosexual intimacy
    • Hospital patients
    • Qualitative study
    • Quality of life
    • Relationship satisfaction
    • Sexual dysfunction

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Sexual satisfaction, quality of life and the transaction of intimacy in hospital patients' accounts of their (hetero)sexual relationships'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this