Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the short-term physiologic response to three soft lens materials with different oxygen permeability characteristics.
METHODS: Forty-three neophytes were randomly prescribed Acuvue 2, Acuvue Advance (Johnson & Johnson Vision Care), or Focus Night & Day (CIBA Vision) for 4 weeks on a daily-wear basis. A further 19 subjects did not wear lenses (control). Experimental and control subjects were examined 2 and 4 weeks after dispensing. Ocular physiologic response was measured with a slitlamp biomicroscope in a strictly masked fashion.
RESULTS: Limbal redness increased in the Acuvue 2 group compared with the other two groups. Conjunctival redness increased more in the Acuvue 2 group than in the Acuvue Advance group. More conjunctival staining was seen with the Acuvue Advance and Focus Night & Day groups compared with the Acuvue 2 group. Increased scores for papillary conjunctivitis were seen in the Focus Night & Day group compared with the Acuvue Advance group.
CONCLUSIONS: The reduced level of limbal redness seen with the Acuvue Advance and Focus Night & Day groups suggests that these lenses provide more oxygen to the ocular surface than the Acuvue 2 lens to a degree that can be observed clinically. The conjunctival staining response was similar for the Acuvue Advance and Focus Night & Day groups. The results for the Acuvue Advance and Focus Night & Day groups for papillary conjunctivitis may reflect differences in their material and surface properties.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 911-21 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Optometry and Vision Science |
Volume | 81 |
Issue number | 12 |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2004 |
Keywords
- Adult
- Conjunctivitis/etiology
- Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic
- Female
- Humans
- Hydrogels
- Male
- Oxygen/metabolism
- Prosthesis Fitting
- Silicone Elastomers