Sin Properly and Improperly So Called: A Wesleyan (Re)Evaluation of Habitual Sin

This article explores John Wesley's theology of sin and sanctification, with a particular focus on habitual sin and its implications for adherents of Christianity. It examines Wesley's distinction between "sin properly so called" (willful transgressions) and "sin improperly so called" (involuntary transgressions or sins of infirmity), proposing an expansion of the latter category to include habitual sins stemming from trauma or physiological weaknesses. The author highlights Wesley's pastoral approach, emphasizing the role of repentance, accountability, and both instantaneous and progressive sanctification, as a potential model in understanding and interacting with habitual sin. Taking neuroscience, psychology, and biochemistry into consideration, the article argues for a compassionate application of Wesleyan theology to modern struggles with habitual sin, advocating for the use of communal support, accountability structures, and practical means of grace such as prayer, Scripture, and works of mercy. Ultimately, the article calls for a nuanced understanding of habitual sin within Christianity generally and Wesleyan theology specifically, encouraging believers to seek healing and transformation through both spiritual and practical resources.