Social capital: The anatomy of a troubled concept

Lisa Adkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Within the social sciences the widespread impact of the social capital concept has prompted strong critique on the part of feminists, for it is a concept which appears to reinstate a version of social worlds which for the past thirty years or more feminist social scientists have sought to problematize and move beyond. Yet do these critiques go beyond the social capital paradigm? It is the contention of this article that they do not and in particular that such critiques fail to problematize the association of women with collective social goods found in the social capital literature. It will be suggested further that this association relates to the use of a dualism of instrumentality versus freedom, whereby women are overwhelmingly associated with the latter. This article therefore delineates a gendered subtext operative within the social capital debates. Recognition of this subtext should lead feminists to disengage with the social capital concept, for this is a concept whose use will always trap women in the social-historical time of industrial society. Copyright © 2005 SAGE Publications.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)195-211
Number of pages16
JournalFeminist Theory
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2005

Keywords

  • Affective labour
  • Bourdieu
  • Communication
  • Economy
  • Social capital

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social capital: The anatomy of a troubled concept'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this