Social knowledge

Keith Jensen, Joan B Silk, Kristin Andrews, Redouan Bshary, Dorothy L Cheney, Nathan Emery, Charlotte K Hemelrijk, Kay Holekamp, Derek C Penn, Josef Perner, Christoph Teufel, J Fischer (Editor), R Menzel (Editor)

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    The social milieus of animals can be complex, ranging from almost completely asocial to monogamous pairs (no mean feat) to entire societies. To adapt to a constantly shift- ing environment of individuals striving toward their own goals, animals appear to have evolved specialized cognitive abilities. As appealing and intuitive as the idea of social cognition is, just defining it is difficult. We attempted to delineate social cognition, speculate on its adaptive value, and come to an understanding of what we mean when we talk about complexity. Transitive inference was often brought up as an example of a cognitive ability that is important for social animals, though the focus of much of the discussion was on theory of mind. For some, theory of mind is something of a Holy Grail, whereas for others, it is more of a McGuffin. There are a number of challenges and debates in trying to determine what cognitive abilities different animals use to solve their social problems. This chapter discusses methodological approaches and issues that are needed to propel the future of research into social knowledge.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationAnimal Thinking
    Place of PublicationCambridge, MA
    PublisherMIT Press
    Pages267-291
    Number of pages25
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Social knowledge'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this