Software Must be Recognised as an Important Output of Scholarly Research

Caroline Jay, Robert Haines, Daniel S. Katz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Software now lies at the heart of scholarly research. Here we argue that as well as being important from a methodological perspective, software should, in many instances, be recognised as an output of research, equivalent to an academic paper. The article discusses the different roles that software may play in research and highlights the relationship between software and research sustainability and reproducibility. It describes the challenges associated with the processes of citing and reviewing software, which differ from those used for papers. We conclude that whilst software outputs do not necessarily fit comfortably within the current publication model, there is a great deal of positive work underway that is likely to make an impact in addressing this.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Digital Curation
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 22 Dec 2021


Dive into the research topics of 'Software Must be Recognised as an Important Output of Scholarly Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this