Solving the paradox of the equipotential and modular brain: A neurocomputational model of stroke vs. slow-growing glioma

James L. Keidel, Stephen R. Welbourne, Matthew A. Lambon Ralph

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    145 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In acute brain damage (e.g., stroke), patients can be left with specific deficits while other domains are unaffected, consistent with the classical 'modular' view of cortical organization. On this view, relearning of impaired function is limited because the remaining brain regions, tuned to other domains, have minimal capacity to assimilate an alternative activity. A clear paradox arises in low-grade glioma where an even greater amount of cortex may be affected and resected without impairment. Using a neurocomputational model we account for the modular nature of normal function as well as the contrasting types of brain insult through the interaction of three computational principles: patterns of connectivity; experience-dependent plasticity; and the time course of damage. This work provides support for a neo-Lashleyan view of cortical organization. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1716-1724
    Number of pages8
    JournalNEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
    Volume48
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2010

    Keywords

    • Computational modelling
    • Entrenchment
    • Glioma
    • Language
    • Plasticity
    • Stroke

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Solving the paradox of the equipotential and modular brain: A neurocomputational model of stroke vs. slow-growing glioma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this