TY - JOUR
T1 - Spaces of regional governance
T2 - A periodisation approach
AU - Salder, Jacob
N1 - Funding Information:
The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for the valuable comments and suggestions made to improve the quality of this paper. Additional thanks are extended to Professor John R Bryson and Dr Julian Clark for comments on this work during its development.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - This paper discusses regional governance and the relationship between spaces of economic governance and notions of regional economy. The region’s prominence in state spatial strategy has run alongside tendencies for spatial reform in pursuit of optimum spatial articulation of economy. Ongoing spatial reform holds implications for structural interpretation, policy priority and intervention practice. To this extent, regional governance can be understood using a periodisation approach, a response framed through specific temporal arrangements influenced by preceding actions, approaches and outcomes. Such changes however do not occur in isolation of prior spatial iterations, presenting both regional demarcation and practice as a dynamic process. This process involves three concurrent episodes of structuring, casting and disruption, creating a periodisation framework. Focusing on the English region of Greater Birmingham and Solihull and its Southern Staffordshire sub-region, I discuss the evolution of regional governance arrangements and through these interpretation and reflection of regional economic structure. I argue periodisation occurs not in punctuated forms but as a dynamic and historically founded relationship influencing reform, appropriating policy, and selectively interpreting structure for organisational interest. These complex relationships create a form of tidal heating through which regions are in a state of constant flux.
AB - This paper discusses regional governance and the relationship between spaces of economic governance and notions of regional economy. The region’s prominence in state spatial strategy has run alongside tendencies for spatial reform in pursuit of optimum spatial articulation of economy. Ongoing spatial reform holds implications for structural interpretation, policy priority and intervention practice. To this extent, regional governance can be understood using a periodisation approach, a response framed through specific temporal arrangements influenced by preceding actions, approaches and outcomes. Such changes however do not occur in isolation of prior spatial iterations, presenting both regional demarcation and practice as a dynamic process. This process involves three concurrent episodes of structuring, casting and disruption, creating a periodisation framework. Focusing on the English region of Greater Birmingham and Solihull and its Southern Staffordshire sub-region, I discuss the evolution of regional governance arrangements and through these interpretation and reflection of regional economic structure. I argue periodisation occurs not in punctuated forms but as a dynamic and historically founded relationship influencing reform, appropriating policy, and selectively interpreting structure for organisational interest. These complex relationships create a form of tidal heating through which regions are in a state of constant flux.
KW - Regional governance
KW - periodisation
KW - relationality
KW - spatial economy
UR - https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/spaces-of-regional-governance(7acb5fb3-afc9-41e8-ba11-b9651f1fb3f8).html
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082828629&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/2399654420912441
DO - 10.1177/2399654420912441
M3 - Article
SN - 2399-6544
VL - 38
SP - 1036
EP - 1054
JO - Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space
JF - Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space
IS - 6
ER -