TY - JOUR
T1 - Spending, canvassing and electoral success in marginal constituencies: England and Scotland in 2017
AU - Johnston, Ron
AU - Pattie, Charles
AU - Hartman, Todd
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elections, Public Opinion & Parties.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Substantial evidence shows that candidates’ and parties’ performances in constituencies at UK general elections are influenced by the intensity of their local campaigns, but that evidence is almost invariably based on analyses of voting across all constituencies. Most constituencies are unlikely to change hands, however. This paper explores whether the impact of spending varies according to seat marginality and analyses the pattern of spending and canvassing in the 123 Labour-Conservative marginals in England and all 59 constituencies in Scotland. The results are consistent with expectations: campaigning and canvassing matters most where campaigning and canvassing should matter most.
AB - Substantial evidence shows that candidates’ and parties’ performances in constituencies at UK general elections are influenced by the intensity of their local campaigns, but that evidence is almost invariably based on analyses of voting across all constituencies. Most constituencies are unlikely to change hands, however. This paper explores whether the impact of spending varies according to seat marginality and analyses the pattern of spending and canvassing in the 123 Labour-Conservative marginals in England and all 59 constituencies in Scotland. The results are consistent with expectations: campaigning and canvassing matters most where campaigning and canvassing should matter most.
U2 - 10.1080/17457289.2019.1582534
DO - 10.1080/17457289.2019.1582534
M3 - Article
SN - 1745-7289
VL - 31
SP - 59
EP - 76
JO - Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties
JF - Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties
IS - 1
ER -