Abstract
The management of spinal cord ependymomas in Neurofibromatosis Type 2
(NF2) has traditionally been conservative, in contrast to the management of
sporadic cases; the assumption being that, in the context of NF2, they did not
cause morbidity. With modern management and improved outcome of other
NF2 tumours, this assumption, and therefore the lack of role for surgery, has
been questioned. To compare the outcome of conservative treatment of spinal
ependymomas in NF2 with surgical intervention in selected patients.
Retrospective review at two NF2 centers, Manchester, UK and Paris/Lille,
France. In Manchester patients were managed conservatively. In France
surgery was a treatment option. Inclusion in the study was based on tumor
length of greater than 1.5 cm. The primary parameter assessed was acquired neurological deficit measured by the Modified McCormick Outcome Score.
24 patients from Manchester and 46 patients from France were analyzed.
From Manchester, 27% of these patients deteriorated during the course of
follow-up. This effectively represents the natural history of ependymomas in
NF2. Of the surgical cases, 23% deteriorated postoperatively, but only 2/18
(11%) of those operated on in the NF2 specialist centers. Comparison of the
two specialist centers Manchester/France showed a significantly improved
outcome (P = 0.012, χ test) in the actively surgical center. Spinal
ependymomas produce morbidity. Surgery can prevent or improve this in
selected cases but can itself can produce morbidity. Surgery should be
considered in growing/symptomatic ependymomas, particularly in the
absence of overwhelming tumor load where bevacizumab is the preferred
option.
(NF2) has traditionally been conservative, in contrast to the management of
sporadic cases; the assumption being that, in the context of NF2, they did not
cause morbidity. With modern management and improved outcome of other
NF2 tumours, this assumption, and therefore the lack of role for surgery, has
been questioned. To compare the outcome of conservative treatment of spinal
ependymomas in NF2 with surgical intervention in selected patients.
Retrospective review at two NF2 centers, Manchester, UK and Paris/Lille,
France. In Manchester patients were managed conservatively. In France
surgery was a treatment option. Inclusion in the study was based on tumor
length of greater than 1.5 cm. The primary parameter assessed was acquired neurological deficit measured by the Modified McCormick Outcome Score.
24 patients from Manchester and 46 patients from France were analyzed.
From Manchester, 27% of these patients deteriorated during the course of
follow-up. This effectively represents the natural history of ependymomas in
NF2. Of the surgical cases, 23% deteriorated postoperatively, but only 2/18
(11%) of those operated on in the NF2 specialist centers. Comparison of the
two specialist centers Manchester/France showed a significantly improved
outcome (P = 0.012, χ test) in the actively surgical center. Spinal
ependymomas produce morbidity. Surgery can prevent or improve this in
selected cases but can itself can produce morbidity. Surgery should be
considered in growing/symptomatic ependymomas, particularly in the
absence of overwhelming tumor load where bevacizumab is the preferred
option.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 605-611 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Journal of Neuro-Oncology |
Volume | 136 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 29 Nov 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2018 |
Keywords
- Neurofibromatosis type 2
- NF2
- Ependymoma
- Spinal cord
- McCormick grading system