Spreads versus Professional Forecasters as predictors of future output change

Kevin Aretz, David A. Peel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We examine whether real output forecasts obtained from the Survey of Professional Forecasters efficiently embody information in the term structure spread. To this end, we employ revised data as well as real-time vintage data, and we also allow for the possible impact of asymmetric loss functions. Assuming quadratic loss, our results suggest that the term structure spread does contain information useful for forecasting not reflected in the survey forecasts, at least over the longest forecast horizon. However, if we allow agents' loss functions to become more negatively skewed with the forecast horizon, then we cannot reject the rationality of the survey forecasts. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)517-522
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Forecasting
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2010

Keywords

  • Real GDP growth
  • Survey of Professional Forecasters
  • Term structure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Spreads versus Professional Forecasters as predictors of future output change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this