Stakeholder reporting: The role of intermediaries

Pamela Stapleton, David Woodward

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility encompasses a multiplicity of different concepts, such that its nature is confused, and it remains difficult to operationalize because opening dialogue with and responding to the various expectations of diverse stakeholders is beyond the capacity of many companies. This paper adapts Mayston's normative "information beneficiaries" framework and focuses on intermediaries who might potentially use published financial information to open a restricted form of dialogue with companies, which might benefit unsophisticated stakeholders. The paper examines the Mayston framework using interviews conducted in organizations that might act on behalf of three stakeholder groups associated with gas and electricity suppliers in the United Kingdom, these being: consumers, employees, and the environment. While a long chain of communication exists between utility company and stakeholder, and many organizations do not fulfill their full potential as information intermediaries, there is some evidence that Mayston's framework might well operate in practice. © 2009 Center for Business Ethics at Bentley College.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)183-216
Number of pages33
JournalBusiness and Society Review
Volume114
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2009

Keywords

  • stakeholder reporting
  • information beneficiaries

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stakeholder reporting: The role of intermediaries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this