Abstract
The numerous network centrality indices proposed in the
literature have little in common but the operational quantification
of an intuition that nodes in better positions
are more central, where “position” is relative to a particular
conceptualization. We propose to discriminate
centrality indices from other indices by focusing on a minimal
requirement for “better” instead. Formally, we posit
that a centrality ranking must preserve the neighborhoodinclusion
preorder, and discuss advantages of such an
approach.
literature have little in common but the operational quantification
of an intuition that nodes in better positions
are more central, where “position” is relative to a particular
conceptualization. We propose to discriminate
centrality indices from other indices by focusing on a minimal
requirement for “better” instead. Formally, we posit
that a centrality ranking must preserve the neighborhoodinclusion
preorder, and discuss advantages of such an
approach.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | SIAM Workshop on Network Science |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Keywords
- network centrality