Abstract
The financial crisis can be understood in many different terms. In this article, it is analyzed in terms of the unfolding of a series of elite narratives that shaped the agenda of regulation before the crisis, that were damaged by the crisis, and that were then reframed and recounted again in the wake of the crisis. The form of these stories differs in subtle ways by jurisdiction, and thus the fate of postcrisis regulatory practice likewise differs. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 35-59 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Governance |
Volume | 25 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2012 |