Structure activity relationships in skin sensitization using the murine local lymph node assay

J. Ashby, D. A. Basketter, D. Paton, I. Kimber

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Murine local lymph assay node data for 106 chemicals are listed. Among these, 73 are active in the assay indicating their potential as skin sensitizing agents. Broad structure activity relationships (SAR) are suggested based on the electrophilic theory of skin sensitization suggested by Landsteiner and Jacobs in 1936, and elaborated by Dupuis and Benezra in 1982. Eight classes of agent are discerned; electrophiles, potential electrophiles after metabolism, Michael-reactive agents, benzoylating agents, ionic chemicals and miscellaneous agents. The electrophilic theory cannot at present fully explain the activity of agents in the last two classes. That fact will hopefully focus research into their mode of action. Some chemicals fit equally into more than one class, and such agents are entered into the several classes in order not to bias the analysis. Attention is given to why not all chemicals of a class are active in the assay. It is concluded that a combination of inappropriate lipophilicity, molecular size and metabolic detoxification are responsible for these inactivities. Given a sufficient number of analogues tested within each class it should be possible eventually to predict with accuracy the skin sensitizing potential of new members of the class. However, the present analysis is qualitative, not quantitative. Finally, the parallelism between sensitizing potential and mutagenic potential for chemicals is explored further. © 1995.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)177-194
    Number of pages17
    JournalToxicology
    Volume103
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 10 Dec 1995

    Keywords

    • Murine local lymph node assay
    • Skin sensitization
    • Structure activity relationships

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Structure activity relationships in skin sensitization using the murine local lymph node assay'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this