Structured objects in OWL: representation and reasoning

Boris Motik, Bernardo Cuenca Grau, Ulrike Sattler

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

    Abstract

    Applications of semantic technologies often require the representation of and reasoning with structured objects-that is, objects composed of parts connected in complex ways. Although OWL is a general and powerful language, its class descriptions and axioms cannot be used to describe arbitrarily connected structures. An OWL representation of structured objects can thus be underconstrained, which reduces the inferences that can be drawn and causes performance problems in reasoning. To address these problems, we extend OWL with description graphs, which allow for the description of structured objects in a simple and precise way. To represent conditional aspects of the domain, we also allow for SWRL-like rules over description graphs. Based on an observation about the nature of structured objects, we ensure decidability of our formalism. We also present a hypertableau-based decision procedure, which we implemented in the HermiT reasoner. To evaluate its performance, we have extracted description graphs from the GALEN and FMA ontologies, classified them successfully, and even detected a modeling error in GALEN.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceeding of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web 2008, WWW'08|Int. World Wide Web Conf. - Proc. Int. Conf. World Wide Web, WWW
    Pages555-564
    Number of pages9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2008
    Event17th International Conference on World Wide Web 2008, WWW'08 - Beijing
    Duration: 1 Jul 2008 → …
    http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/ sattler/publications/www08.pdf

    Conference

    Conference17th International Conference on World Wide Web 2008, WWW'08
    CityBeijing
    Period1/07/08 → …
    Internet address

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Structured objects in OWL: representation and reasoning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this