Abstract
Drawing on a thematic analysis of longitudinal qualitative data (ntotal = 118), this article takes a "whole student lifecycle" approach to examine how lower and higher income students at an English northern red brick university variously attempted to manage their individual budgets. It explores how students reconcile their income-in the form of loans, grants, and bursaries-with the cost of living. Four arenas of interest are described: planning, budgeting, and managing "the student loan"; disruptions to financial planning; the role of familial support; and strategies of augmenting the budget. In detailing the micro-level constraints on the individual budgets of lower and higher income undergraduates, the article highlights the importance of non-repayable grants and bursaries in helping to sustain meaningful participation in higher tariff, more selective, higher education institutions. It also supports an emerging body of literature that suggests that the continuing amendments to the system of funding higher education in England are unlikely to address inequality of access, participation, and outcome.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Social Policy and Administration |
Early online date | 27 May 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Keywords
- Higher education
- Part-time employment
- Private credit
- Student debt
- Student loans
- Widening participation