TY - JOUR
T1 - Studies of Hysteresis and Quantum Tunnelling of the Magnetisation in Dysprosium(III) Single Molecule Magnets
AU - Ortu, Fabrizio
AU - Reta, Daniel
AU - Ding, You-song
AU - Goodwin, Conrad Alexander Phillip
AU - Gregson, Matthew
AU - Mcinnes, Eric J L
AU - Winpenny, Richard E. P.
AU - Zheng, Yan-zhen
AU - Liddle, Stephen
AU - Mills, David P
AU - Chilton, Nicholas F
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - We report magnetic hysteresis studies of three Dy(III) single-molecule magnets (SMMs). The three compounds are [Dy(tBuO)Cl(THF)5][BPh4] (1), [K(18-crown-6-ether)(THF)2][Dy(BIPM)2] (2, BIPM = C{PPh2NSiMe3}2), and [Dy(Cpttt)2][B(C6F5)4] (3), chosen as they have large energy barriers to magnetisation reversal of 665, 565, and 1223 cm-1, respectively. There are zero-field steps in the hysteresis loops of all three compounds, that remain in magnetically dilute samples and in samples that are isotopically enriched with 164Dy, which has no nuclear spin. These results demonstrate that neither dipolar fields nor nuclear hyperfine coupling are solely responsible for the quantum tunnelling of magnetisation at zero field. Analysing their vibrational modes, we find that the modes that most impact the first coordination sphere occur at the lowest energies for 1, at intermediate energies for 2 and at higher energies for 3, in correlation with the hysteresis coercive fields. Therefore, we suggest that the efficiency of quantum tunnelling of magnetisation is related to molecular flexibility.
AB - We report magnetic hysteresis studies of three Dy(III) single-molecule magnets (SMMs). The three compounds are [Dy(tBuO)Cl(THF)5][BPh4] (1), [K(18-crown-6-ether)(THF)2][Dy(BIPM)2] (2, BIPM = C{PPh2NSiMe3}2), and [Dy(Cpttt)2][B(C6F5)4] (3), chosen as they have large energy barriers to magnetisation reversal of 665, 565, and 1223 cm-1, respectively. There are zero-field steps in the hysteresis loops of all three compounds, that remain in magnetically dilute samples and in samples that are isotopically enriched with 164Dy, which has no nuclear spin. These results demonstrate that neither dipolar fields nor nuclear hyperfine coupling are solely responsible for the quantum tunnelling of magnetisation at zero field. Analysing their vibrational modes, we find that the modes that most impact the first coordination sphere occur at the lowest energies for 1, at intermediate energies for 2 and at higher energies for 3, in correlation with the hysteresis coercive fields. Therefore, we suggest that the efficiency of quantum tunnelling of magnetisation is related to molecular flexibility.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85067489646
U2 - 10.1039/C9DT01655D
DO - 10.1039/C9DT01655D
M3 - Article
SN - 1477-9226
JO - Dalton Transactions
JF - Dalton Transactions
ER -