Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) resection during pancreatectomy for malignant disease of the pancreas: A systematic review

Santhalingam Jegatheeswaran, Minas Baltatzis, Saurabh Jamdar, Ajith K. Siriwardena

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Resection of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) during pancreatectomy is performed infrequently and is undertaken with the aim of removing non-metastatic locally advanced pancreatic tumours. SMA resection reports also encompass resection of other visceral vessels. The consequences of resection of these different arteries are not necessarily equivalent. This is a focused systematic review of the outcome of SMA resection during pancreatectomy for cancer. Methods: A computerized search of the English language literature was undertaken for the period 1st January 2000 through 30th April 2016. The keywords "Pancreatic surgery" and "Vascular resections" were used. Thirteen studies reported 70 patients undergoing pancreatectomy with SMA resection from 10,726 undergoing pancreatectomy. Individual patient-level outcome data were available for 25. Results: Median (range) accrual period was 132 (48-372) months. Reported peri-operative morbidity ranged from 39% to 91%. There were 5 peri-operative deaths in the 25 patients with individual-outcome data. Median survival was 11 months (95% Confidence interval 9.5-12.5 months; standard error 0.8 months). Conclusions: SMA resection during pancreatectomy is undertaken infrequently incurring high peri-operative morbidity and mortality. Median survival is 11 (95% CI 9.5-12.5) months. In contemporary practice there is no evidence to support SMA resection during pancreatectomy.

Original languageEnglish
JournalHPB
Volume19
Issue number6
Early online date12 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) resection during pancreatectomy for malignant disease of the pancreas: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this