Syntactic priming in spoken production: Linguistic and temporal interference

H. P. Branigan, M. J. Pickering, A. J. Stewart, J. F. McLean

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Current evidence about the persistence of syntactic priming effects (Bock, 1986) is equivocal: Using spoken picture description, Bock and Griffin (2000) found that it persisted over as many as 10 trials; using written sentence completion, Branigan, Pickering, and Cleland (1999) found that it dissipated if even a single sentence intervened between prime and target. This paper asks what causes it to be long lasting. On one account, the rapid decay evidenced by Branigan et al. occurs because the task empha-sizes conceptual planning; on another account, it is due to the written nature of their task. If conceptual planning is the cause, this might relate to planning the prime sentence or planning an intervening sentence. Hence we conducted an experiment with spoken sentence completion, contrasting no delay, an intervening sentence, and a pure temporal delay. The results indicated that strong and similar priming occurred in all three cases, therefore lending support to the claim that spoken priming is long lasting.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1297-1302
    Number of pages5
    JournalMemory and Cognition
    Volume28
    Issue number8
    Publication statusPublished - 2000

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Syntactic priming in spoken production: Linguistic and temporal interference'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this