Systematic assessments of need and care planning in severe mental illness: Cluster randomised controlled trial

M. Marshall, A. Lockwood, G. Green, G. Zajac-Roles, C. Roberts, G. Harrison

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Background: Surveys have shown high levels of unmet need in representative samples of people with severe mental illness. Introducing standardised needs assessment into the care planning process might reduce these needs and improve outcome. Aims: To determine whether feedback from a standardised assessment of need enhances the effectiveness of care planning and whether exposing care coordinators to feedbackon some patients improves their care of other patients. Method: A single-blind, cluster-randomised trial involving a within-cluster individually randomised arm: patients' needs were evaluated using the Cardinal Needs Schedule and the findings were fed back to their care coordinators under the care programme approach. A total of 304 patients were recruited from 72 care coordinators and 242 patients (79.6%) were reassessed at 12 months. Results: The only significant effect of the intervention was on patient satisfaction. Patients cluster-randomised to receive feedback were more satisfied than controls, but patients individually randomised to receive feedback were not. Conclusions: Standardised needs assessment did not substantially enhance care planning in this trial. However, giving care coordinators some experience of feedback from a standardised assessment of need could improve satisfaction.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)163-168
    Number of pages5
    JournalBritish Journal of Psychiatry
    Volume185
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2004

    Keywords

    • SCHIZOPHRENIC-PATIENTS; MRC NEEDS; COMMUNICATION; INSTRUMENT;
    • COMMUNITY; PEOPLE; ILL

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic assessments of need and care planning in severe mental illness: Cluster randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this