Systematic violations of von Kries rule reveal its limitations for explaining color and lightness constancy

Janus J. Kulikowski, Ausra Daugirdiene, Athanasios Panorgias, Rytis Stanikunas, Henrikas Vaitkevicius, Ian J. Murray

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Cone contrast remains constant, when the same object/background is seen under different illuminations-the von Kries rule [Shevell, Vis. Res. 18, 1649 (1978)]. Here we explore this idea using asymmetric color matching. We find that von Kries adaptation holds, regardless of whether chromatic constancy index is low or high. When illumination changes the stimulus luminance (reflectance), lightness constancy is weak and matching is dictated by object/background luminance contrast. When this contrast is masked or disrupted, lightness constancy mechanisms are more prominent. Thus von Kries adaptation is incompatible with lightness constancy, suggesting that cortical mechanisms must underlie color constancy, as expected from neurophysiological studies [Zeki, Nature 284, 412 (1980); Wild, Nature 313, 133 (1985)]. © 2012 Optical Society of America.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)A275-A289
    JournalOptical Society of America. Journal A: Optics, Image Science, and Vision
    Volume29
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2012

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic violations of von Kries rule reveal its limitations for explaining color and lightness constancy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this